Scribbl vs Fellow: The Honest 2026 Head-to-Head

Scribbl and Fellow are both AI meeting notetakers, but they solve different problems. Scribbl is a botless notetaker: it captures Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls from your own browser or desktop, so no bot ever joins, nothing is announced to attendees, and your meetings connect straight to the AI you already use (ChatGPT or Claude). Fellow is a broader meeting-management platform that pairs an AI notetaker with agendas, talking points, action-item tracking, and a deep integration set across Meet, Zoom, Teams, Slack, and in-person. The one-line verdict: choose Scribbl for clean, no-bot notes that turn into finished follow-up on a free plan, and choose Fellow if you want to run your whole meeting process (agendas plus accountability plus integrations) inside one tool.

Choose Scribbl if / Choose Fellow if

The fastest way to decide is to read these two lists and notice which one describes you.

Choose Scribbl if

• You meet with clients or prospects and do not want a recording bot changing the room
• You want to start free, with no credit card and no setup project
• You live in Google Meet, Zoom, or Teams and want capture from your own side
• You already use ChatGPT or Claude and want your meetings to feed your own AI
• You want a focused notetaker, not a new system to administer

Choose Fellow if

• You want agendas and talking points built into the same tool as your notes
• Accountability matters: assigning and tracking action items across meetings
• Most meetings are internal one-on-ones and team syncs where a recorder is fine
• You need deep integrations into a CRM, Slack, and project-management tools
• You want native mobile and desktop apps plus enterprise compliance out of the box

Scribbl vs Fellow: full comparison table

Here is the head-to-head on the rows that actually change your decision. Scribbl-only facts are stated plainly; for Fellow we describe its well-known strengths and hedge anything that vendor pricing or policy can change, so verify current numbers on each site.

Feature	Scribbl	Fellow
Platforms supported	Google Meet, Zoom, Teams	Meet, Zoom, Teams, in-person
No bot joins the call		Bot-free capture
Free plan (no credit card)		Free plan
Paid plans (per seat, monthly/annual)	Yes (see pricing)	Yes (check site)
Transcription + AI summaries
Languages supported	Core set	90+ (per Fellow)
Action-item & accountability tracking	Action items
Meeting agendas & templates	–
Connects to ChatGPT or Claude		–
Native integrations (CRM, Slack, PM)	Lighter, Google-centric	50+ native
Search across meeting history	Your AI reasons across calls
Native mobile + desktop apps	Chrome ext + desktop	Mobile + desktop apps
Security / compliance	No data training	SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR (per Fellow)
Best for	No-bot notes on external calls	Team meeting hygiene at scale

Capture method: botless vs bot-free

This is the line that separates the two tools in practice. Scribbl is botless: it captures the meeting from your own device and session, so the attendee list looks exactly the way it would if you were not taking notes at all. Nothing is announced, no admission prompt appears, and there is no participant to explain. For anyone whose meetings regularly include people outside their own company, that is the feature that decides it. Our full write-up on the botless AI notetaker walks through why this matters more than any feature checklist.

Fellow also markets bot-free capture, and credit where due: it is not the old model of a clearly labeled bot crashing the roster. Fellow's notetaker is designed to record through its desktop and mobile apps without sending a traditional joining participant into every call. The practical difference is where the capture lives and how much else rides along with it. Scribbl keeps capture in your browser or desktop and stops there; Fellow ties capture to a larger meeting-management system. If your goal is the lightest possible footprint on an external call, Scribbl's in-browser approach is the most direct path. If your goal is to standardize how the whole team runs meetings, Fellow's platform is built for that.

Structure vs focus: how much process do you want in one tool

Fellow is a meeting management system. It bundles the notetaker with agendas, talking points, recurring meeting templates, and action-item tracking. If your team wants to standardize how meetings are planned and run, that structure is the point, and it can be worth the setup. Managers who run a lot of one-on-ones and recurring syncs are exactly who Fellow is built for, and its 50+ integrations into CRMs, Slack, and project tools let those action items flow into the systems a team already lives in.

Scribbl is deliberately focused. It does not try to run your meeting process. It captures the meeting without a bot, then connects it to the AI you already use, ChatGPT or Claude, so you can hand the transcript to your own assistant and have it draft the recap, pull the action items, or reason across several past calls at once. Instead of moving your meeting rituals into a new app, the meeting becomes context your existing AI can act on. Plenty of people keep a light agenda wherever they already work and let Scribbl handle capture and the follow-up, with no bot and nothing to administer. If you are weighing Fellow specifically, our Fellow alternatives roundup puts it next to several other options.

Pricing: Scribbl vs Fellow in 2026

Both tools are easy to start without paying. Fellow offers a free plan, and Scribbl has a free plan with no credit card required. Beyond the free tier, both sell paid plans on a per-seat basis billed monthly or annually. We will not quote specific Fellow prices here, because vendor pricing changes and you should check the source directly. The point that holds over time is that Scribbl is free to start and the very first thing you get is botless notes wired into ChatGPT or Claude, with paid plans available when you need more. You can review Scribbl's plans on the pricing page.

Honest pros and cons

Neither tool is the right answer for everyone. Here is the even-handed read.

Scribbl strengths: truly botless capture (no participant added, nothing announced), a free plan with no credit card, fast setup as a Chrome extension or desktop app, and a direct connection to ChatGPT or Claude so your own AI drafts the follow-up. Scribbl weaknesses: it is focused on capture, not meeting management, so there are no built-in agendas or templates; its integration set is lighter and more Google-centric than Fellow's; the mobile experience is browser-first rather than a full native app; and like any notetaker, transcription can struggle with heavy jargon or speaker identification on multi-accent calls.

Fellow strengths: a complete meeting-management platform (agendas, talking points, recurring workflows), strong action-item and accountability tracking, a wide 90+ language set per Fellow's own materials, 50+ native integrations, native mobile and desktop apps, and enterprise compliance (SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, no data training) per Fellow. Fellow tradeoffs: it is a bigger system to adopt and administer than a focused notetaker, that breadth typically comes at a higher price point, and the meeting-management scaffolding is overhead you may not need if all you want is clean notes without a bot.

Third-party ratings

Buyers want social proof, not just a vendor's own claims, so check the review aggregators directly. Scribbl carries a strong rating on the Chrome Web Store and review sites, and Fellow is well rated on platforms like G2. We are not going to invent star counts for either tool here; visit G2 and the Chrome Web Store for current, verified ratings and review volumes before you commit a team.

5.0

Average rating from 3,000 reviews

10,000+

Organizations using Scribbl

$0

To start, no credit card required

When to switch (and when not to)

If you are on Fellow today and the agenda and accountability features are the reason your team adopted it, you probably should not switch. That is Fellow's strength, and ripping it out to gain botless capture is a net loss if the structure is load-bearing for how you work.

The clear signal to move to Scribbl is the opposite case: you adopted Fellow mostly for the notes, the meeting-management scaffolding sits unused, and the recorder showing up on external calls has become a friction point with clients or prospects. In that situation, switching is low-risk. Scribbl installs in about a minute as a Chrome extension or desktop app, the free plan lets you run a real call before committing, and there is no migration project because you are not moving a process, just changing how capture happens. People who switch almost always say the same thing: the agenda features were nice, but they wanted notes without a bot in every external call. Sales teams especially gravitate here; see Scribbl for sales.

If you are mapping the wider field, our Google Meet AI note taker guide and the Scribbl vs Otter.ai breakdown cover two of the most common adjacent comparisons.

FAQ

What is the main difference between Scribbl and Fellow? Scribbl is a botless AI notetaker that captures from your own browser or desktop, so nothing joins the call and nothing is announced to attendees, and it connects your meetings to the AI you already use (ChatGPT or Claude). Fellow is a broader meeting-management platform: it pairs an AI notetaker with agendas, talking points, action-item tracking, and a wide set of integrations across Meet, Zoom, Teams, and in-person. Pick Scribbl for clean, no-bot notes on a free plan; pick Fellow if you want agendas and accountability workflows built into one tool.

Is Scribbl free? Yes. Scribbl has a free plan with no credit card required. You install the Chrome extension or desktop app, sign in, and start capturing botless notes right away. Paid plans are available when you need more, and you can see them on the pricing page.

Does Fellow work on Google Meet? Yes, Fellow supports Google Meet along with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and in-person meetings. Scribbl also supports Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams. The difference is the capture method: Scribbl is botless and records from your side, while Fellow's notetaker is designed to capture without a traditional joining bot through its desktop and mobile apps. Always confirm current platform support on each tool's site.

How does Scribbl vs Fellow pricing compare? Both offer a free plan, so you can try either without paying. Beyond that, both sell paid plans on a per-seat basis billed monthly or annually. We do not quote Fellow's exact prices here because vendor pricing changes; check each site for current numbers. The durable point is that Scribbl is free to start and the first thing you get is botless notes wired into ChatGPT or Claude.

Which is better for sales and external client calls? Scribbl. On external calls with prospects, clients, or partners, a recording bot that joins the meeting can change the room before the conversation starts. Scribbl is botless, so the attendee list looks exactly as it would if you were not taking notes. Fellow is stronger for internal meeting hygiene (recurring one-on-ones, team syncs, agendas), which is its home turf.

Which has more integrations, Scribbl or Fellow? Fellow has the broader integration set, with native connections to CRMs, Slack, and project-management tools. Scribbl keeps a lighter, more Google-centric integration footprint but connects your meetings directly to ChatGPT or Claude, so your own AI assistant does the downstream work instead of routing through dozens of native connectors.

Do I need to tell people I am recording with Scribbl or Fellow? Yes, regardless of which tool you use. Botless capture removes the awkward extra participant, but it is not about hiding anything. Recording and consent laws vary by region, so tell attendees you are capturing AI notes and get consent. That is good practice with any notetaker, Fellow included.