Scribbl vs Fellow: The Honest 2026 Head-to-Head
Scribbl vs Fellow compared side by side: platforms, pricing, bot vs botless capture, integrations, and a clear pick-by-use-case verdict for 2026.
Updated October 7, 2026
On this page9 sections
Scribbl and Fellow are both AI meeting notetakers, but they solve different problems. Scribbl is a botless notetaker: it works on Google Meet through a Chrome extension and on Zoom and Microsoft Teams through Scribbl Desktop, so no bot ever joins and nothing is announced to attendees, and Automations do the follow-up after every meeting. Fellow is a broader meeting-management platform that pairs an AI notetaker with agendas, talking points, action-item tracking, and a deep integration set. The one-line verdict: Scribbl is the pick for clean, no-bot notes that turn into finished follow-up on a free plan, without moving your whole meeting process into a new system.
Who should pick Scribbl over Fellow
The fastest way to decide is to read this list and notice whether it describes you. Pick Scribbl if:
- You meet with clients or prospects and do not want a recording bot changing the room
- You want to start free, with no credit card and no setup project
- You live in Google Meet, Zoom, or Teams and want all three in one account
- You already use ChatGPT or Claude and want to ask about one group of meetings at a time, sorted for you by Smart Collections
- You want the follow-up done for you: Automations draft the email, log notes in HubSpot or Pipedrive, post to Slack or Teams, or open a Linear, Jira, Asana or Monday ticket
- You want a focused notetaker, not a new system to administer
Fellow suits managers who want agendas and talking points built into the same tool as their notes.
Scribbl vs Fellow: full comparison table
Here is the head-to-head on the rows that actually change your decision. Scribbl facts are stated plainly; for Fellow we hedge anything that vendor pricing or policy can change, so verify current numbers on each site.
| Feature | Scribbl | Fellow |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms supported | Google Meet, Zoom, Teams | Meet, Zoom, Teams |
| No bot joins the call | Yes | Bot-free capture |
| Free plan (no credit card) | 10 meetings a month | Free plan |
| Paid plans (per seat, monthly/annual) | $13/user/mo billed annually, $20 monthly | Yes (check site) |
| Transcription + AI summaries | Yes | Yes |
| Action items | Every meeting | Yes |
| Connects to ChatGPT or Claude | Yes | Yes (admin turns it on) |
| Integrations (CRM, Slack, project tools) | Automations: HubSpot, Pipedrive, Slack, Teams, Notion, Jira, Asana and more | 50+ native |
| Search across meeting history | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | No-bot notes and finished follow-up | Team meeting hygiene at scale |
Capture method: botless vs bot-free
This is the line that separates the two tools in practice. Scribbl is botless: nothing joins the call, so the attendee list looks exactly the way it would if you were not taking notes at all. Nothing is announced, no admission prompt appears, and there is no participant to explain. For anyone whose meetings regularly include people outside their own company, that is the feature that decides it. Our full write-up on the botless AI notetaker walks through why this matters more than any feature checklist.
Fellow also markets bot-free capture: its notetaker is designed to record through its desktop and mobile apps without sending a traditional joining participant into every call. The practical difference is how much else rides along with it. Fellow ties capture to a larger meeting-management system you adopt and administer. Scribbl keeps capture light (the Chrome extension for Google Meet, Scribbl Desktop for Zoom and Teams) and puts the effort into what happens next: every meeting gets the video, a transcript with speaker names, AI notes and action items, and Automations do the follow-up. If your goal is the lightest possible footprint on an external call and finished follow-up after it, Scribbl is the most direct path.
Structure vs focus: how much process do you want in one tool
Fellow is a meeting management system. It bundles the notetaker with agendas, talking points, recurring meeting templates, and action-item tracking, which means moving how your team plans and runs meetings into Fellow and keeping it set up there.
Scribbl is deliberately focused. It does not try to run your meeting process. It captures the meeting without a bot, then connects it to the AI you already use, ChatGPT or Claude, so you can hand the transcript to your own assistant and have it draft the recap, pull the action items, or reason across several past calls at once. Automations do the follow-up (draft the email, log notes in HubSpot or Pipedrive, post to Slack or Teams, save to Notion, Google Drive or Confluence, open Linear, Jira, Asana or Monday tickets), and by default they ask before changing anything. Smart Collections sort your meetings by themselves into groups you describe in one sentence. Instead of moving your meeting rituals into a new app, the meeting becomes context your existing AI can act on. Plenty of people keep a light agenda wherever they already work and let Scribbl handle capture and the follow-up, with no bot and nothing to administer. If you are weighing Fellow specifically, our Fellow alternatives roundup puts it next to several other options.
Pricing: Scribbl vs Fellow in 2026
Both tools are easy to start without paying. Fellow offers a free plan, and Scribbl has a free plan with no credit card required. Beyond the free tier, both sell paid plans on a per-seat basis billed monthly or annually. We will not quote specific Fellow prices here, because vendor pricing changes and you should check the source directly. The point that holds over time is that Scribbl is free to start and the very first thing you get is botless notes with the video, a transcript with speaker names, AI notes and action items. Scribbl's free plan covers 10 meetings a month on Google Meet, Zoom and Teams, and Pro is $13 per user per month billed annually, or $20 monthly. You can review Scribbl's plans on the pricing page.
Scribbl strengths and Fellow tradeoffs
Scribbl strengths: truly botless capture (no participant added, nothing announced); the video, a transcript with speaker names, AI notes and action items for every meeting; Google Meet, Zoom and Teams in one account; a free plan with no credit card; fast setup as a Chrome extension or desktop app; a connection to ChatGPT or Claude on Pro, with Smart Collections narrowing what it searches to one group of meetings; and Automations that do that follow-up for you.
Fellow tradeoffs: Fellow is a complete meeting-management platform (agendas, talking points, recurring workflows), which makes it a bigger system to adopt and administer than a focused notetaker, and the meeting-management scaffolding is overhead you may not need if all you want is clean notes without a bot.
Third-party ratings
Buyers want social proof, not just a vendor's own claims, so check the review aggregators directly. Scribbl is rated 5.0 from 3,000 reviews on the Chrome Web Store and 4.9 from 725 reviews on G2, and Fellow is well rated on platforms like G2. We are not going to invent star counts for Fellow here; visit G2 for its current, verified ratings and review volumes before you commit a team.
When to switch from Fellow to Scribbl
The clear signal to move to Scribbl: you adopted Fellow mostly for the notes, the meeting-management scaffolding sits unused, and the recorder showing up on external calls has become a friction point with clients or prospects. In that situation, switching is low-risk. Scribbl installs in about a minute as a Chrome extension or desktop app, the free plan lets you run a real call before committing, and there is no migration project because you are not moving a process, just changing how capture happens. People who switch almost always say the same thing: the agenda features were nice, but they wanted notes without a bot in every external call. Sales teams especially gravitate here; see Scribbl for sales.
If you are mapping the wider field, our Google Meet AI note taker guide and the Scribbl vs Otter.ai breakdown cover two of the most common adjacent comparisons.
Scribbl vs Fellow FAQ
What is the main difference between Scribbl and Fellow? Scribbl is a botless AI notetaker: nothing joins the call and nothing is announced to attendees, every meeting gets the video, a transcript with speaker names, AI notes and action items, and Automations do the follow-up. Fellow is a broader meeting-management platform that pairs an AI notetaker with agendas, talking points, action-item tracking, and a wide set of integrations. Scribbl is the pick for clean, no-bot notes and finished follow-up on a free plan, without a new system to administer.
Is Scribbl free? Yes. Scribbl has a free plan with no credit card required: 10 meetings a month, including Google Meet, Zoom and Teams. You install the Chrome extension or desktop app, sign in, and start capturing botless notes right away. Pro is $13 per user per month billed annually, or $20 monthly, and you can see the plans on the pricing page.
Does Fellow work on Google Meet? Yes, Fellow supports Google Meet along with Zoom and Microsoft Teams. Scribbl also supports Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams in one account. The difference is the capture method: Scribbl is botless, so nothing joins the call, while Fellow's notetaker is designed to capture without a traditional joining bot through its desktop and mobile apps. Always confirm current platform support on each tool's site.
How does Scribbl vs Fellow pricing compare? Both offer a free plan, so you can try either without paying. Scribbl's free plan covers 10 meetings a month on Google Meet, Zoom and Teams, and Pro is $13 per user per month billed annually, or $20 monthly. Fellow sells paid plans per seat too; we do not quote Fellow's exact prices here because vendor pricing changes, so check its site for current numbers. The durable point is that Scribbl is free to start and the first thing you get is botless notes with the video, a transcript with speaker names, AI notes and action items.
Which is better for sales and external client calls? Scribbl. On external calls with prospects, clients, or partners, a recording bot that joins the meeting can change the room before the conversation starts. Scribbl is botless, so the attendee list looks exactly as it would if you were not taking notes, and Automations can log the notes in HubSpot or Pipedrive and draft the follow-up email. Fellow is built mainly around internal meeting routines (recurring one-on-ones, team syncs, agendas).
Which has more integrations, Scribbl or Fellow? Fellow lists 50+ native integrations. Scribbl's Automations cover the places meeting follow-up usually goes: draft the email, log notes in HubSpot or Pipedrive, post to Slack or Teams, save to Notion, Google Drive or Confluence, open Linear, Jira, Asana or Monday tickets, or add a Google Sheet row, and by default they ask before changing anything. Scribbl also connects to ChatGPT or Claude on Pro, and Smart Collections narrow what they search to one group of meetings, so your own AI can do any other downstream work.
Do I need to tell people I am recording with Scribbl or Fellow? Yes, regardless of which tool you use. Botless capture removes the awkward extra participant, but it is not about hiding anything. Recording and consent laws vary by region, so tell attendees you are capturing AI notes and get consent. That is good practice with any notetaker, Fellow included.
Try Scribbl
Let your meetings take their own notes.
Scribbl records, transcribes, and summarizes your Google Meet calls from your browser. No bot joins the call. Free forever for individuals.
Add to Chrome · It's free