6 Best Supernormal Alternatives in 2026 (Compared, Real Pricing, Free Plans, and a Botless Pick)

The best Supernormal alternative for most people is Scribbl. It fixes the usual reasons people leave: no bot joins the call, you ask ChatGPT or Claude for the notes in any format you want, and the free plan (no credit card) works across Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams. Fathom, Fireflies, Otter, and Gong are the other names on most lists, and all of them put a bot in the call by default. Below we compare six alternatives on capture method, real pricing, free plans, platform coverage, and accuracy, with a full feature matrix straight against Supernormal.

We make Scribbl, so we are a primary source on Scribbl. Every competitor price in this guide is the published entry tier from each vendor's own pricing page (Otter, Fireflies, and Fathom rechecked on October 7, 2026), and every rating is that tool's real, public G2 (or Capterra) score and review count from the same month, so you are weighing researched facts, not vendor guesswork. Prices and ratings still drift, so we date-stamp them and link you to the source to reconfirm.

Jump to what you need

• Why people switch from Supernormal
• How we compared
• Best alternative by use case
• The feature matrix and independent ratings
• The 6 best alternatives, reviewed
• Bot vs botless: the deciding factor
• How to choose
• FAQ

Why people switch from Supernormal

The same handful of reasons keep sending people looking for a Supernormal alternative.

1. Limited customization of notes and templates. This is the most cited complaint. People want notes shaped to their meeting type, a discovery call, a 1:1, a standup, a board review, and find the available template controls too rigid. When the format does not fit, you end up reworking the output by hand.
2. Transcription accuracy gaps. Users report errors on product names, industry jargon, and proper nouns, which matters most when the notes feed a CRM or a follow-up email. A summary built on a mangled transcript inherits the mistakes.
3. Pricing concerns past the free tier. The free plan is commonly cited as capped on the number of meetings, and the step up to paid surprises some teams as usage grows. People shopping for an alternative often want either a more generous free tier or a clearer price.
4. Platform and compatibility gaps. Coverage and integrations do not always match every team's stack, and some users hit gaps on the platform or workflow they actually use.
5. A bot in the room on external calls. In its common setup a recorder can appear in the meeting. On a sales demo, an interview, or a first client call, a visible notetaker changes the room and can be declined or blocked.
6. Follow-up that is still manual. Many people now want the recap, the draft email, the CRM notes, and the next steps done after every call, rather than a summary they still have to act on by hand.

If two or more of these describe you, you are exactly who this list is for. The rest of this guide maps each pain point to the tools that fix it.

How we compared these Supernormal alternatives

This is the part most listicles skip. Here is what we compared each tool on in June 2026.

• Accuracy. Product names, numbers, accented speech, and crosstalk, since that is where Supernormal users report problems.
• Customization. How far each tool lets you reshape the notes for different meeting types, because rigid templates are the top Supernormal complaint.
• Capture and visibility. Whether a bot joins and whether attendees see it.
• After the call. The summary, the action items, the follow-up flow, and how easily the output moves into the tools you already work in.
• Price, free tier, and ratings. We pulled each tool's published starting price and free-tier shape and pointed to where its third-party reviews live (G2, Capterra, the Chrome Web Store, or the app stores), so you can sanity-check both yourself.

We weighted the read in this order, because this is the order that changes your day to day: capture method first, then customization and accuracy, then total cost and free tier, then what happens after the call, then track record. We say this openly because it explains why a botless, free, AI-connected tool scores well on our weighting. If your priorities differ, the matrix gives you the raw inputs to re-rank for yourself.

Best Supernormal alternative by use case

If you only have a minute, jump to the one that matches your situation. Each links to the full write-up below.

• Best botless / no-bot alternative: Scribbl (nothing joins the call).
• Best free Supernormal alternative: Scribbl (free, no credit card, Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams included).
• Best for sales teams: Scribbl, for botless external calls plus follow-up: Automations log notes in HubSpot or Pipedrive and draft the email.
• Best for customizable notes: Scribbl, with note templates and any format you ask ChatGPT or Claude for.
• Best for product and cross-functional teams: Scribbl, with Automations that open Linear, Jira, Asana, or Monday tickets and save to Notion or Confluence.
• Bot-based tools by niche: Fireflies (integrations), Otter (live transcription), tl;dv (video clips), and Gong (revenue analytics for enterprise sales teams). All of them put a bot in the call; each is reviewed below.

Supernormal alternatives feature matrix

This is the asset most lists are missing: a complete, side-by-side grid of the things that actually decide this purchase, with Scribbl and Supernormal in the same view. The single most important row is the first one, does a bot join the call, because it changes whether your meetings stay normal. Every price below is the published entry point from each vendor's pricing page (Otter, Fireflies, and Fathom rechecked October 7, 2026), and the bottom row carries each tool's real G2 score and review count so you are not taking our word for any of it. Prices still move, so treat the date stamp as the as-of and reconfirm before you buy.

Feature	Scribbl	Supernormal	Otter	Fireflies	Fathom	tl;dv	Gong
No bot joins the call	Yes	– No	– No	– No	– No	– No	– No
Free plan (no credit card)	Yes	20 mtgs/mo	300 min/mo	400 min storage	Unlimited rec; advanced summaries 5/mo	Unlimited rec	– No
Entry paid price, billed annually	$13/user/mo	$18/user/mo	$8.33/user/mo	$10/user/mo	$16/user/mo	$18/user/mo	Quote, ~$5k+/yr
Google Meet / Zoom / Teams	All three	All three	All three	All three	All three	All three	All three
Records video, not just audio	Yes	Yes	Limited	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
AI summary and action items	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Ask your meetings in ChatGPT or Claude	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Customizable note templates	Yes, plus your own AI	Limited	Limited	Yes	Limited	Limited	Yes
CRM / Slack / Notion integrations	HubSpot, Pipedrive, Slack, Notion (Automations)	Yes	Limited	Deep	Yes	Yes	Deep, native
Chrome extension + desktop app	Yes	Extension	Yes	Yes	Desktop	Yes	Limited
G2 rating (Jun 2026)	4.9 / 725	4.4 / ~19	4.3 / ~300	4.7 / ~750	5.0 / ~6,500	4.7 / ~490	4.7 / ~6,600

To make the third-party signal impossible to miss, here are those same public ratings as a single picture. These are independent G2 scores (Scribbl shown on its Chrome Web Store rating), not our scoring.

Scribbl (Chrome Web Store, 3,000 reviews) 5.0

Fathom (G2, ~6,500 reviews) 5.0

Fireflies (G2, ~750 reviews) 4.7

tl;dv (G2, ~490 reviews) 4.7

Gong (G2, ~6,600 reviews) 4.7

Supernormal (G2, ~19 reviews) 4.4

Otter (G2, ~300 reviews) 4.3

The 6 best Supernormal alternatives

Scribbl is first as the pick for most people switching. Supernormal follows it, for reference, so you can see what each alternative changes.

1. Scribbl, the botless free pick (and yes, we make it)

Scribbl solves three of the problems that send most people looking for a Supernormal alternative: rigid templates, the bot, and the bill. It has a real free plan with no credit card, and it is botless: nothing joins the call, nothing is announced, and no notification goes to the people you are meeting with. It works on Google Meet with its Chrome extension and on Zoom and Microsoft Teams with Scribbl Desktop (Mac with Apple silicon and Windows), and connects your meetings to the AI you already use, ChatGPT or Claude, so the follow-up work gets done rather than just stored. On the Chrome Web Store it is rated 5.0 from 3,000 reviews and it is used by more than 10,000 organizations. Those last two are Scribbl's own verifiable numbers; everything we say about competitors should be confirmed on their sites. More on the approach in our botless AI notetaker explainer.

What to know: nothing appears in the attendee list and no one is prompted to admit a recorder, which is the whole point. Here is the Scribbl notes view after a Google Meet call: a TL;DR, an executive summary, key topics, and action items, all from a recording where nothing joined the room.

The part that separates Scribbl from a fixed-template notetaker is what happens after the call. Instead of choosing from a short list of layouts, you connect your meeting library to ChatGPT or Claude, or just one Smart Collection, so you can ask for any format you want, pull facts across calls, draft a follow-up grounded in what was actually said, and prep CRM notes without copy-pasting transcripts. That is also the answer to the customization complaint: the template is whatever you ask for. Automations handle the rest of the follow-up: draft the email, log notes in HubSpot or Pipedrive, post to Slack or Teams, or save to Notion, and by default they ask before changing anything.

You still get the full recording and a clickable transcript when you want them, with speaker labels and a timeline you can jump around in.

The notes and the recording live side by side, so you can read the AI summary and jump straight to the moment in the video where something was said, without leaving the page.

Pros: botless on Meet, Zoom, and Teams; real free plan, no credit card; Chrome extension for Google Meet and Scribbl Desktop for Zoom and Teams; connects to ChatGPT or Claude so notes take any format and the follow-up gets written; 5.0 from 3,000 reviews on the Chrome Web Store; used by 10,000+ organizations.

Pricing: free plan with no credit card, 10 meetings a month, Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams included; Pro is $13 per user per month billed annually, or $20 monthly. See the pricing page.

Best for: anyone with client, sales, or external calls who wants notes with no bot, across multiple platforms, with a free start and full control over the note format. For sales teams specifically, see Scribbl for sales.

vs Supernormal: same core job (AI meeting notes), but botless instead of a bot in the room, free with no credit card, and customizable through your own AI rather than fixed templates.

Supernormal (for reference)

Supernormal is here as the baseline the rest of the list is measured against: a simple AI notetaker with automatic summaries and a free tier, along with the rigid templates, accuracy misses, and recorder in the call that send people looking.

What to know: in its common setup a recorder is visible in the room.

Pros: clean, automatic AI meeting notes; simple to set up; a free tier to start; connects to ChatGPT and Claude (its free plan lists MCP); popular and well-known.

Cons: limited customization of notes and templates; accuracy gaps on names and jargon; pricing concerns past the capped free tier; a recorder can appear in the call.

Pricing (verified June 2026): free plan capped at about 20 meetings per month; Pro published around $18 per user per month, with a Business tier above it. Supernormal began moving to credit-based pricing in 2026, so confirm the current model on its pricing page.

Ratings (June 2026): G2 4.4 out of 5 from about 19 reviews; Capterra has too few reviews (one, at 4.0) to be meaningful yet. G2 reviewers praise the fast setup and support but, matching the switch reasons above, the recurring lower-star theme is wanting more control over note format and the occasional miss on names. Check the live G2 page for current sentiment.

Best for: people who want a simple, automatic notetaker and accept fixed templates and a recorder in the call.

2. Otter.ai (most mature live transcription)

Otter is a mature transcription tool with strong live captions and a large searchable archive. If your core need is reliable live transcription rather than heavy analytics, and a bot in the call is fine, it is a capable, lower-cost option. It typically adds an assistant to the call to capture audio.

What to know: the OtterPilot assistant is visible to the room.

Pros: strong live transcription and captions; large searchable archive; mobile app; connects to ChatGPT and Claude; lower cost than the heavy platforms.

Cons: typically adds a visible assistant to the call; free tier caps minutes and features; lighter on customizable templates and CRM writeback.

Pricing: free Basic plan with 300 transcription minutes per month; Pro is $8.33 per user per month billed annually, or $16.99 monthly; Business is $19.99 billed annually, or $30 monthly (Otter pricing).

Ratings (June 2026): G2 4.3 out of 5 from roughly 300 reviews; Capterra 4.4 out of 5 from around 98 reviews. The strongest praise in reviews is the real-time transcription and searchable archive; the recurring complaints that line up with people leaving are the minute caps on the free plan and accuracy slipping on accents and crosstalk.

Best for: users who want mature live transcription and a searchable archive. See our Otter alternative and Scribbl vs Otter.

vs Supernormal: stronger live transcription and a deeper archive, but still bot-based, and customization is similarly limited.

3. Fireflies.ai (deep search and integrations)

Fireflies is one of the more established and feature-rich options, with strong search, a wide set of integrations, native CRM writeback, structured templates, and team analytics. Its standard model sends a notetaker bot, often named Fred, into the meeting.

What to know: the Fred bot is visible in the call.

Pros: deep feature set; broad integrations including Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, and Notion; strong search; more template and workflow control than Supernormal.

Cons: a visible bot in the call; the breadth can feel heavy for simple needs; not as deep as Gong for enterprise revenue intelligence.

Pricing: free plan with 800 transcription minutes and a limited one-time AI credit pool; Pro is $10 per seat per month billed annually, or $18 monthly; Business is $19 billed annually, or $29 monthly (Fireflies pricing).

Ratings (June 2026): G2 4.7 out of 5 from roughly 750 reviews; Capterra 4.9 out of 5 with a high recommend rate. Reviewers consistently single out the search, the integration depth, and the automatic notes; the lower-star theme is the bot in the call and feeling the breadth is heavy for simple needs.

Best for: teams that want depth, integrations, and search and do not mind a join-the-call bot. See our Fireflies alternative and Scribbl vs Fireflies.

vs Supernormal: more customization, search, and integrations, at the cost of a heavier tool and a bot in the call.

4. Fathom (best generous free tier)

Fathom is a polished, widely loved notetaker. It typically joins the meeting to record and produces clean summaries and action items, and it is well regarded for a generous free experience, which is exactly what budget-conscious Supernormal leavers look for. The trade is the usual one: a participant appears in the call.

What to know: the notetaker is visible in the call, which is fine for internal meetings and the reason it ranks below the botless pick for external ones.

Pros: clean, fast summaries; well-liked, generous free experience; simple to set up; quick processing.

Cons: a bot joins the call; less of a fit for guarded external meetings; on the free plan, advanced summaries cover only your first 5 calls each month, and AI action items need Premium; customization is closer to Supernormal than to Fireflies.

Pricing: free plan with unlimited recordings, transcripts, and storage; every call gets an AI summary, but advanced summaries cover only your first 5 calls each month, and AI action items, AI follow-up emails, and Ask Fathom need Premium. Premium is $16 per user per month billed annually, or $20 monthly; Team is $15 billed annually, or $19 monthly, per user, with a 2-user minimum (Fathom pricing).

Ratings (June 2026): G2 5.0 out of 5 from roughly 6,500 reviews, one of the most-reviewed and highest-rated tools on this list; Capterra 4.8 out of 5. Reviewers repeatedly call out the clean summaries, fast processing, and the genuinely generous free tier; the main complaint is the bot in the call and that advanced summaries are capped on the free plan.

Best for: internal-heavy teams that want a clean, popular notetaker and a strong free tier, and are fine with a bot. See our Fathom alternative and Scribbl vs Fathom.

vs Supernormal: a more generous free tier and very clean summaries, but still bot-based with similar template limits.

5. tl;dv (best for video clips and multilingual)

tl;dv is a video-forward notetaker built around recording, timestamped highlights, and shareable clips, with wide language support and AI summaries. It generally joins the meeting to record and is popular with teams who share moments from calls.

What to know: a bot is visible in the call.

Pros: strong video recording, clips, and highlights; broad language support; AI summaries and integrations; free tier to start.

Cons: a bot joins the call; the video and clip focus is more than a notes-only user needs; revenue analytics are lighter than the enterprise platforms.

Pricing (verified June 2026): free plan with unlimited recordings, transcription, and AI summaries; Pro around $18 per user per month on annual billing; Business around $59 per user per month for coaching and analytics. Confirm on tl;dv's site.

Ratings (June 2026): G2 4.7 out of 5 from roughly 490 reviews, with about 85% of reviewers giving five stars. The clip-and-highlight workflow and broad language support draw the most praise; the recurring criticism is the bot in the call and that the video focus is more than a notes-only user needs.

Best for: teams who want video clips and multilingual coverage. See our tl;dv alternative and Scribbl vs tl;dv.

vs Supernormal: stronger video and language coverage, but bot-based and heavier if you only want notes.

6. Gong (best for enterprise sales teams)

Gong is the heavyweight of revenue intelligence: deal scoring, pipeline forecasting, conversation analytics, and coaching at scale, with deep native CRM integration. It is a step up in scope and price from a notetaker, sold as a platform rather than a simple per-seat tool, and it generally joins meetings to capture.

What to know: the point of Gong is not the notes, it is the deal and pipeline intelligence layered on top, which is more than most teams below the enterprise level will use. The bot is visible, and the buying process is an enterprise sales motion, not a self-serve signup.

Pros: deepest revenue intelligence and forecasting; strong coaching and deal analytics; deep CRM integration; built for large revenue orgs.

Cons: a bot joins the call; expensive, typically an annual platform contract often starting in the thousands; far more than a small or non-sales team needs; not self-serve.

Pricing (verified June 2026): quote-based annual platform contracts, commonly cited starting around $5,000 per year and rising substantially with seats and modules; there is no self-serve per-seat price or free tier. Confirm directly with Gong.

Ratings (June 2026): G2 4.7 out of 5 from roughly 6,600 reviews, the deepest review base on this list and a repeat G2 category leader. Reviewers praise the deal and pipeline intelligence and coaching at scale; the recurring criticism is the cost and that it is far more than a small or non-sales team needs.

Best for: enterprise revenue teams that need forecasting and deal intelligence, not just notes. See our Gong AI notetaker alternative and Scribbl vs Gong.

vs Supernormal: a completely different scope (revenue platform vs notetaker); overkill unless you specifically need enterprise deal intelligence.

Bot vs botless: the deciding factor

The single biggest difference across this whole list is how each tool gets into your meeting, so it is worth seeing it side by side.

Supernormal and most alternatives

• Capture: a bot can join the meeting as a participant
• Attendees see it: yes, and some remove or block it
• Failure mode: the bot can fail to join or be denied
• Examples: Supernormal, Otter, Fireflies, Fathom, tl;dv, Gong

Scribbl (botless)

• Capture: nothing joins the call
• Attendees see it: no bot, nothing announced, no email
• External calls: the meeting stays exactly normal
• Plus: free plan, Meet, Zoom, and Teams in one account, Smart Collections and Automations

Being botless also makes capture more resilient. A bot is a participant, which means it can be denied, removed, or blocked by meeting controls. Botless capture sidesteps that whole category of problem because nothing is trying to join in the first place.

How to choose your Supernormal alternative

You do not need to weigh every feature. Scribbl is the pick if any of these describe you:

• Rigid templates, the bot, or the price is your reason for leaving. You get a real free plan with no credit card, Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams in one account, and your meetings wired into ChatGPT or Claude so you control the note format and the follow-up gets written.
• Your calls include clients, prospects, candidates, or partners. Nothing joins the call, nothing is announced, and no email goes to attendees. For sales teams this is usually decisive; see Scribbl for sales.
• You want the follow-up done, not just notes. Automations draft the email, log notes in HubSpot or Pipedrive, post to Slack or Teams, and open Linear, Jira, Asana, or Monday tickets.
• You have a lot of meetings to keep track of. Search across meetings, and Smart Collections sort them by themselves into groups you describe in one sentence.

Gong suits enterprise revenue teams that need deal scoring and pipeline forecasting rather than meeting notes, with a bot in the call and an annual contract.

The short rule: if your meetings include clients, prospects, candidates, or partners, the bot is the variable that matters, and a botless tool keeps the call normal while still getting you notes. If your reason for leaving is rigid templates, the most flexible answer is connecting your meetings to your own AI so the format is whatever you ask for. You can compare Scribbl's plans on the pricing page.

How to switch from Supernormal without losing anything

Switching is lower-stakes than it feels, because you can run the new tool alongside Supernormal before you cancel. Here is the clean path, using the botless free pick as the example.

1. 1

   Export what you want to keep from Supernormal

   Pull any transcripts and summaries you still need out of Supernormal first, so nothing is trapped behind a lapsed subscription later.

2. 2

   Install your new tool

   For Scribbl, add the Chrome extension for Google Meet or Scribbl Desktop for Zoom and Teams, and sign in with the free plan. No credit card is required to start.

3. 3

   Run it on one real meeting

   Join your next Google Meet, Zoom, or Teams call. With a botless tool nothing joins the room, so there is no recorder to announce and no setup the other side has to approve.

4. 4

   Check the output

   Read the transcript and summary, and if you use ChatGPT or Claude, ask it about the meeting in the exact note format and follow-up you want.

5. 5

   Cancel Supernormal once you are happy

   After a few meetings you trust the new tool, turn off your Supernormal subscription so you are not paying for both.

Keep both running for a week if you want a side-by-side before committing. The only step that is not reversible is canceling Supernormal, so do that last.

Supernormal alternatives FAQ

What is the best Supernormal alternative in 2026?

Scribbl, for most people leaving Supernormal. It is botless, so nothing joins the call, it works across Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams in one account, and it connects your meetings to ChatGPT or Claude so you can ask for the notes in any format you want. The free plan needs no credit card. Fathom, Fireflies, Otter, and Gong are the other common names, and all of them put a bot in the call by default.

Why do people switch from Supernormal?

The reasons that come up most are limited customization of notes and templates, transcription accuracy gaps on technical terms and proper nouns, pricing concerns as you move past the free tier, and platform or compatibility gaps. Many also want the follow-up done after every call, not just a summary to act on by hand. Confirm current pricing and limits on Supernormal's site, because plans change.

Does Supernormal have a free plan, and do the alternatives?

Supernormal offers a free tier, commonly cited as capped on the number of monthly meetings, with paid plans for more. Several alternatives also have free plans: Scribbl has a free plan with no credit card and is botless, Fathom is widely cited for a generous free tier, and Otter, Fireflies, and tl;dv all offer free tiers with caps. Confirm current free-tier limits on each vendor's pricing page, because caps change often.

What is the best free Supernormal alternative?

Scribbl. It has a genuine free plan with no credit card, and it is botless, so nothing joins your calls. Each of the 10 meetings a month on the free plan gets the video, a transcript with speaker names, AI notes and action items, on Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams. Fathom's free tier records without limit, but its bot joins your calls and advanced summaries cover only the first 5 calls each month. tl;dv and Otter offer free tiers as well, both with a bot in the call. Confirm current numbers on each vendor's pricing page, since free-tier caps change often.

Does Scribbl put a bot in the meeting like Supernormal?

No. Scribbl is botless, so no bot ever joins the call, no participant named after the tool appears in the attendee list, and no email is sent to other attendees. Many notetakers, including Supernormal in its common setup, can add an assistant to the meeting to record and transcribe. If keeping the call free of a visible recorder matters to you, Scribbl is built specifically for that.

Which Supernormal alternative is best for sales teams?

Scribbl. On external sales calls nothing joins, so the room stays normal, and Automations log the notes in HubSpot or Pipedrive, draft the follow-up email, and post to Slack or Teams, asking before they change anything by default. On Pro you can also ask Claude or ChatGPT about every call. Gong suits enterprise revenue teams that want deal scoring and forecasting on an annual contract, with a bot in the call.

Which Supernormal alternative is best for enterprise?

For enterprise teams that want meeting notes and the follow-up done, Scribbl: nothing joins the call, Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams sit in one account, Smart Collections sort meetings by themselves into groups you describe in one sentence, and Automations log notes in HubSpot or Pipedrive, post to Slack or Teams, and open Jira or Asana tickets. Gong suits revenue organizations that need deal scoring and pipeline forecasting, sold as an annual platform contract with a bot in the call.

Is Scribbl free?

Yes. Scribbl has a free plan with no credit card required: 10 meetings a month on Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams. Pro is $13 per user per month billed annually, or $20 monthly. The simplest way to compare against Supernormal is to run one real meeting on Scribbl's free plan first. For what each plan includes, see the Scribbl pricing page.

Which Supernormal alternative is most accurate?

Accuracy depends heavily on audio quality, accents, jargon, and crosstalk, so no single tool wins every call. Accuracy on technical terms and proper nouns is a common Supernormal complaint. Run one real call with your own product names and judge for yourself.

Can I customize meeting notes better than in Supernormal?

Yes, with Scribbl. Limited customization of notes and templates is one of the most common reasons people look for a Supernormal alternative. Scribbl has note templates, and it connects each meeting to ChatGPT or Claude, so you can ask for any format you want rather than picking from a fixed list. Every meeting also has its own AI chat for quick questions.

How do I switch from Supernormal without losing anything?

Export anything you want to keep from Supernormal first, then install your new tool and run it on one real meeting before you cancel. With Scribbl you install the Chrome extension (for Google Meet) or Scribbl Desktop (for Zoom and Teams), sign in with the free plan, no credit card, and join your next Google Meet, Zoom, or Teams call. Nothing joins the meeting, so there is no setup to announce to attendees. Once you have a few meetings you are happy with, cancel Supernormal so you are not paying for both.