Scribbl vs Fathom: The Honest 2026 Comparison
Scribbl vs Fathom compared head to head: bot vs botless capture, platforms, free-plan reality, pricing, G2 ratings, accuracy, and a clear pick-X-if verdict. Scribbl is botless and free to start; Fathom is a polished bot-based notetaker with a generous free tier.
Published June 19, 2026
If you are choosing between Scribbl and Fathom, here is the short answer. Pick Scribbl if you do not want a bot ever joining your calls, especially if your meetings live in Google Meet, and you want notes wired into ChatGPT or Claude so the follow-up actually gets done; it is botless, works with Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams, and starts free with no credit card. Pick Fathom if you want the most generous free tier in the category (unlimited recordings) across Zoom, Meet, and Teams and you are fine with a visible bot joining the meeting. Both tools are genuinely good and both are loved by their users. The one decision that changes your day to day is the capture method: a bot in the room or nothing. The rest of this comparison breaks it down row by row with dated June 2026 prices and free-tier caps for both.
Scribbl vs Fathom at a glance
Both tools turn a live meeting into a transcript, a summary, and action items, and both have a loyal user base for good reason. Where they split is the question your attendees notice first: does something join the call. The table below is organized around the decisions buyers actually make, with real, dated numbers for both sides so you are not stuck on either vendor's pricing page. Read it, then jump to the section for whichever row decides it for you.
| Decision factor | Scribbl | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| Capture method | Botless: captures from your own session | Notetaker bot joins the call |
| Visible to attendees | No bot, nothing announced, no email to guests | Yes, the bot appears as a participant |
| Platforms | Google Meet first, plus Zoom and Microsoft Teams | Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams |
| How it runs | Chrome extension (Meet) + desktop app (Zoom, Teams) | Joining bot across supported platforms |
| Free plan | Free Lite: about 10 meetings/mo, no credit card; recorded video expires after ~2 months | Unlimited recordings and transcription; rich AI summaries on ~first 5 calls/mo |
| Entry paid price | Pro from about $13/user/mo billed annually (5-seat min), up to ~$20/user/mo | Paid from about $16/user/mo billed annually (~$20/mo monthly) |
| Team-size note | Free and Pro effectively cap around 5 users; larger teams move to the Team tier | Free CRM sync capped at 3 users per domain; paid tiers lift the cap |
| Post-call AI | Summary, action items, and connects to ChatGPT or Claude | Summaries, highlights, and Ask Fathom in-app |
| Best for | Google-Meet-first solo users and small teams (5 or fewer) | Multi-platform teams wanting a free unlimited tier |
| G2 rating | ~4.9/5 from 686+ reviews (plus 5.0 from 3,000+ on the Chrome Web Store) | ~5 stars across thousands of reviews |
| Used by | 10,000+ organizations | Large, established user base |
| Recording consent | Disclose and get consent; no bot to admit | Disclose and get consent; bot is visible |
If you are also weighing Otter.ai, the third tool most buyers shortlist alongside these two, here is how all three line up on the features that actually decide it. Competitor details below are our best read as of June 2026; confirm anything pricing- or plan-specific on each vendor's own page.
| Feature | Scribbl | Otter | Fathom |
|---|---|---|---|
| No bot ever joins the call | – | – | |
| Nothing announced, no email to attendees | – | – | |
| Google Meet support | |||
| Zoom support | |||
| Microsoft Teams support | |||
| Connects to the AI you already use (ChatGPT or Claude) | – | – | |
| Records meeting video | Limited | ||
| Transcript, summary, and action items | |||
| Search across past meetings | |||
| Free plan, no credit card | |||
| Rated 5.0 from 3,000+ Chrome Web Store reviews | – | – | |
| Trusted by 10,000+ organizations | Large user base | Large user base |
The one decision that matters: bot vs botless
This is the whole comparison in one section. Fathom generally relies on a notetaker bot that joins your meeting, records it, and produces a clean summary afterward. When it works, the recaps are polished and people are right to like them. The trade is that the bot is visible. Other attendees see it join, it may need to be admitted, and on client or external calls it can feel like a recording device showed up uninvited. Google Meet in particular sometimes flags or blocks joining notetaker bots, so the capture can fail on exactly the platform many teams use most.
Scribbl takes the botless route. It captures the meeting from your own session, so there is no extra participant in the attendee list, nothing is announced when the call starts, and no notification is sent to the people you are meeting with. For sales calls, client meetings, interviews, and any conversation where a visible recording bot would change the tone, botless capture is the difference between getting notes and skipping the tool entirely. If you want the deeper argument, see our explainer on the botless AI notetaker.
- Capture: a notetaker bot joins the meeting
- In the room: a participant is added and visible
- Google Meet: joining bots can be flagged or blocked
- Free tier: unlimited recordings (rich AI summaries on ~first 5 calls/mo)
- After the call: polished recaps and Ask Fathom in-app
- Capture: botless, from your own session
- In the room: nothing joins, nothing announced
- Google Meet: built Meet-first via a Chrome extension
- Free tier: free Lite plan, ~10 meetings/mo, no credit card
- After the call: notes wired into ChatGPT or Claude
You
Client
Platforms: Google Meet first vs broad bot coverage
Platform fit is the second pivot, and it is where many people settle the choice. Scribbl is built around Google Meet first. The Chrome extension captures Meet with nothing in the room, and the desktop app extends the same botless idea to Zoom and Microsoft Teams. If your week is mostly Google Meet, Scribbl is the most natural fit on the market, because it lives right where you already work and never has to fight Meet's bot-blocking.
Fathom covers the major platforms broadly with its joining bot across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. If your meetings are spread evenly across all three and you do not mind a participant joining, that breadth is a real strength. The honest read: both tools cover all three platforms, so the platform question is really about how you want capture to happen on each one, botless from your side or a bot that joins.
Free plan and pricing reality
Let us be straight, because this is where Fathom shines. Fathom's free tier is the most generous in the category. As of June 2026 it includes unlimited recording and transcription, with its richest AI summaries applied to roughly the first 5 calls a month. If a no-cost, no-limits ceiling is your top priority and a visible bot is fine, that is a legitimately strong reason to choose Fathom, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. Fathom's paid plans start around $16/user/mo billed annually (about $20/mo on monthly billing), with higher Team and Business tiers adding things like full CRM field sync and SSO.
Scribbl starts free too, with no credit card, and what you get on day one is botless notes. The free Lite plan is capped at about 10 meetings a month, and recorded video expires after roughly 2 months, so heavy recorders will outgrow it faster than Fathom's free tier. Scribbl Pro starts at roughly $13/user/mo billed annually (with a 5-seat minimum, so about $65/mo entry) and runs up to around $20/user/mo, adding Zoom and Microsoft Teams support; larger teams move to the Team tier. You can confirm current plans on the pricing page.
The honest takeaway on money: if you only care about a free ceiling, Fathom wins outright. Both are free to start, but Fathom's free unlimited recordings beat Scribbl's 15-meeting Lite cap, and at the paid entry point the two are within a few dollars of each other. So price is rarely the row that should decide it. The durable difference is still the capture method: Fathom's free plan gives you bot-based notes with a high ceiling; Scribbl's gives you notes with no bot in the room. Decide on the in-meeting experience first, then weigh price only if you outgrow free.
After the call: connect to the AI you already use
There is a second difference that matters once the call ends. Most notetakers, Fathom included, give you a summary, highlights, and an in-app assistant, all inside their own app. Scribbl goes further by connecting your meetings to the AI you already use, ChatGPT or Claude, so the work gets done, not just the notes. You can ask your own assistant to draft the follow-up email in your voice, pull the decisions into a project tracker, or answer a question across several past meetings at once. The notes are the input; the work is the output. With Fathom, the AI lives behind Fathom's own interface; with Scribbl, your meetings flow into the assistant you already trust.
You: Draft the follow-up from today's client call.
Assistant: Here is a recap, the two decisions, and next steps for each owner.
Accuracy and note quality
Both tools produce a clean transcript, a structured summary, and action items, and most users rate the quality highly. We would rather back that up than just assert it. In the public G2 review base (about 686 reviews as of June 2026), ease of use is by far the most-cited strength of Scribbl, mentioned in roughly 163 reviews, while transcription quality is praised in over 100. The honest caveat that comparison pages usually skip is in the complaints: the single most common one, flagged in about 37 reviews, is accuracy on heavy technical jargon, strong accents, or background noise, and speaker identification gets shaky on busy calls with four or more participants and several accents at once. A separate cluster (21-plus reviews) wishes Scribbl were not so Google-Meet-centric. None of this is unique to Scribbl: independent word-error-rate testing across notetakers shows the whole category degrades on noisy, multi-accent, jargon-heavy audio, so on those large panels no tool is perfect and you should test any of them on a real call first. For one-on-ones, sales calls, interviews, and small team meetings, which is where most of the work happens, accuracy is rarely the row that decides it.
Fathom is widely praised for the polish of its automatic recaps and highlights, and that reputation is earned. If a beautifully formatted post-call summary inside one app is the single thing you care about, Fathom does it well. If you would rather hand the raw meeting to your own ChatGPT or Claude and have it produce exactly the artifact you need, Scribbl is built for that.
G2 ratings and reviews
Head-to-head pages often lead with star averages, so here is the honest picture, with the right numbers attached to the right place. On G2, Scribbl sits at about 4.9 out of 5 across 686 or so reviews as of June 2026, and the Scribbl Chrome extension separately carries a 5.0 from more than 3,000 ratings on the Chrome Web Store; it is used by 10,000+ organizations. Fathom is also rated around 5 stars on G2, but on a much larger base, into the thousands of reviews. We will not round Scribbl's G2 score up to a flat 5.0 or borrow the Chrome Web Store count to inflate it, because you can verify all of this in a click, and a comparison you can trust is the whole point of this page. Both review counts and scores move over time, so check the live G2 listings before you decide. The takeaway is not that one tool is loved and the other is not; both are. Fathom has more total review volume; Scribbl has a marginally higher satisfaction score on a smaller base. The thing a star average will not tell you is why people switch, and for Scribbl the reason is almost always the same: they wanted meeting notes without explaining a bot to everyone on the call.
Who each is best for
Pick Fathom if your team works across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, you want the most generous free tier in the category (unlimited recordings, with the richest AI summaries on about the first 5 calls a month), you value a polished automatic recap inside one app, you are fine with paid plans from around $16/user/mo billed annually, and a visible notetaker bot joining the meeting is not a problem for you or your attendees.
Pick Scribbl if you are a solo user or a small team (think five or fewer) living mostly in Google Meet, you want dead-simple bot-free recording where nothing ever joins the call, you meet with clients, prospects, or candidates where a recording bot changes the room, you are comfortable with a free Lite plan around 10 meetings a month (Pro from roughly $13/user/mo annually if you outgrow it), and you want your notes wired into ChatGPT or Claude so the follow-up work actually gets done. Sales teams in particular tend to land here; see Scribbl for sales.
If you are weighing more than two tools, our Scribbl vs Otter.ai breakdown and our best Fathom alternatives guide lay out the wider field, including how the bot-based notetakers compare to each other.
FAQ
What is the main difference between Scribbl and Fathom?
The capture method. Scribbl is botless: it captures the meeting from your own session through a Chrome extension or desktop app, so no bot ever joins, nothing is announced, and no email goes to attendees. Fathom typically sends a visible notetaker bot into the call to record and summarize it. Everything else flows from that one decision: whether a participant shows up in the room or not.
Is Scribbl or Fathom better for Google Meet?
Scribbl is built around Google Meet first. It captures Meet through a Chrome extension with no bot in the room, which matters because Google Meet sometimes flags or blocks joining notetaker bots. Fathom supports Meet as well, but it joins as a visible participant. If your meetings live in Google Meet and you want nothing to show up in the call, Scribbl is the more natural fit.
Does Scribbl have an unlimited free plan like Fathom?
No, and this is Fathom's clearest win. As of June 2026 Fathom's free tier includes unlimited recording and transcription, with its richest AI summaries capped to roughly the first 5 calls a month. Scribbl's free Lite plan needs no credit card but caps you at about 10 meetings a month, and recorded video expires after roughly 2 months. If a no-cost, no-limits experience is your top priority and a visible bot is fine, Fathom is the better free deal. Limits on both tools change, so confirm the current numbers on each vendor's pricing page. The durable difference is not the free tier; it is that Scribbl's notes come with no bot in the room.
How much do Scribbl and Fathom cost in 2026?
Both start free. As of June 2026, Scribbl's free Lite plan covers about 10 meetings a month with no credit card, and Scribbl Pro starts around $13/user/mo billed annually (with a 5-seat minimum, so roughly $65/mo to start) and runs up to about $20/user/mo, adding Zoom and Microsoft Teams. Fathom's free tier is unlimited recordings with rich AI summaries on about the first 5 calls a month, and its paid plans start near $16/user/mo billed annually (about $20/mo monthly), with higher Team and Business tiers for CRM field sync and SSO. At the paid entry point the two are within a few dollars; the bigger gap is the free tier, where Fathom's unlimited recordings beat Scribbl's 15-meeting cap. Confirm current prices on each vendor's pricing page.
Does Scribbl send a bot into my meeting like Fathom?
No. Scribbl is botless, so nothing joins the call and nothing is announced to other attendees. Fathom typically uses a notetaker bot that joins as a visible participant. That difference in capture method is the main reason people pick one over the other, especially on client, sales, and external calls where a recording bot changes the tone.
Does Scribbl work with Zoom and Microsoft Teams, or only Google Meet?
Scribbl works with Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams. The Chrome extension covers Google Meet, and the desktop app covers Zoom and Microsoft Teams. Fathom also supports the major platforms. If you split your week evenly across Zoom, Meet, and Teams, both cover you; the practical difference is botless capture versus a bot that joins.
How are Scribbl and Fathom rated on G2?
Both are loved, with a clear difference in review volume. As of June 2026 Scribbl sits at about 4.9 out of 5 on G2 across 686 or so reviews, and the Scribbl Chrome extension carries a 5.0 from over 3,000 ratings on the Chrome Web Store. Fathom is rated around 5 stars on G2 but on a far larger base, into the thousands of reviews. Check G2 for the live numbers before you decide. The honest read: Fathom has more total review volume; Scribbl has an unusually clean satisfaction score on a smaller base. The gap that actually decides it day to day is the capture method, not the star average.
Is Scribbl accurate, and where does it struggle?
Scribbl produces a clean transcript, summary, and action items, and most users rate transcription quality highly. Honestly, like most notetakers it can struggle with heavy technical jargon and with speaker identification on busy calls that have four or more people and several accents at once. If your meetings are large, multi-accent panels, test any tool on a real call first. For one-on-ones and small team calls, accuracy is rarely the deciding factor.
Does Scribbl connect to ChatGPT or Claude?
Yes. Instead of trapping your notes inside its own app, Scribbl connects your meetings to the AI you already use, ChatGPT or Claude, so the work gets done, not just the notes. You can ask your own assistant to draft the follow-up email, pull decisions into a tracker, or answer a question across several past meetings. Fathom keeps its AI summaries and Ask Fathom features inside the Fathom app.
How do I switch from Fathom to Scribbl?
There is no migration project. Install the Scribbl Chrome extension (or the desktop app for Zoom and Teams), create a free account with no credit card, and join your next meeting. Scribbl captures from your side with no bot, so you do not have to remove or disable anything in Fathom first. Run both on one real call if you want a side-by-side before you commit.
Can I use Scribbl without telling people I am recording?
Botless does not mean secret. Recording and consent laws vary by region, and some places require all-party consent. The right move with any tool, Scribbl or Fathom, is to tell people you are taking AI notes and get consent. Scribbl simply removes the awkward bot from the room; it does not remove your responsibility to be transparent. You can start free at extension.app.scribbl.co/signup.
Try Scribbl
Let your meetings take their own notes.
Scribbl records, transcribes, and summarizes your Google Meet calls from your browser. No bot joins the call. Free forever for individuals.
Add to Chrome · It's free