Fathom vs Fireflies: 2026 Comparison, Pricing, and Verdict
Fathom vs Fireflies compared on free tier, real pricing, accuracy, CRM, and recording. Fathom wins on free and simplicity; Fireflies wins on CRM price and analytics. Plus a botless third pick.
Published June 19, 2026
If you are choosing between Fathom and Fireflies, here is the short answer. Fathom wins for solo users and small teams because its free plan records unlimited meetings, its summaries stay faithful to the call, and it is simpler to live in day to day. Fireflies wins for sales and revenue teams because it goes deeper on conversation intelligence, talk-time and coaching analytics, supports 100-plus languages, and syncs to your CRM on cheaper per-seat tiers than Fathom. There is no universal winner here, only a winner for your use case, and below we break it down row by row with current 2026 pricing (including the hidden credit and seat costs), our own hands-on test results, CRM specifics, and the December 2025 Fireflies consent lawsuit that now factors into the decision.
Fathom vs Fireflies at a glance
The two tools genuinely win different jobs, so the table below is organized around the decisions buyers actually make: free-tier generosity, real paid pricing (monthly and annual), recording mode, credit and minute caps, AI summaries, CRM tier, conversation intelligence, languages, integrations, supported platforms, and security posture. Read the table, then jump to the section for whichever row decides it for you.
| Decision factor | Fathom | Fireflies |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Unlimited recording and transcription; full AI summaries capped (~5 meetings/month) | Free with limited credits; transcription with a monthly storage/credit cap |
| Paid entry (monthly) | Premium ~$19/user/mo | Pro ~$18/user/mo |
| Paid entry (annual) | Premium ~$15/user/mo billed annually | Pro ~$10/user/mo billed annually |
| Mid / team tier | Team | Business |
| Top tier | Team Pro / Business | Enterprise |
| Recording mode | App-based; often no separate participant; video + audio | Visible AI assistant (Fred) joins as a participant; audio-first |
| Credit / minute caps | No credit system; summary cap on free tier | Credit/minute system; paid tiers cap monthly transcription (e.g. seat minute allocations) |
| AI summaries / templates | Faithful summaries, action items, ask-anything; ~14 templates | Many summary templates (~20-plus by 2026 counts), customizable |
| Conversation intelligence | Lighter analytics | Talk-time, topics, sentiment, coaching analytics |
| CRM integration | Salesforce, HubSpot on higher Team/Business tiers | Salesforce, HubSpot on lower-priced tiers; cheaper CRM sync |
| Languages | ~28-38 (Fathom cites up to 38) | 100-plus languages |
| Integrations (native) | ~10 native (Slack, Notion, CRM, calendar) | 40-plus native (Slack, Notion, Asana, Zapier, CRM) |
| Platforms | Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams | Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, dialers |
| Security / trust note | No comparable consent suit on record as of writing | Cruz v. Fireflies.AI proposed class action, Dec 2025 (allegation, not a ruling) |
The table above pits Fathom against Fireflies. But the row most buyers skip is the capture method itself, so here is the same field with the botless option added. Scribbl is the only one of the three that puts nothing on the participant list, which is why it gets its own column rather than a footnote.
| Feature | Scribbl | Fathom | Fireflies |
|---|---|---|---|
| No bot joins the call | Usually | – | |
| Free plan, no credit card | Limited | ||
| Google Meet | |||
| Zoom | Team plan | ||
| Microsoft Teams | Team plan | ||
| Connects meetings to ChatGPT or Claude | – | – | |
| Records video | – | Audio-first | |
| Ask-anything across past meetings | |||
| Conversation intelligence / talk-time analytics | – | Lighter | |
| CRM sync (Salesforce, HubSpot) | – | Higher tiers | Lower tiers |
| No credit / minute caps | – | ||
| Pricing approach | Free, paid Team | Free + per seat | Free + per seat |
The two hidden costs most comparisons skip
Sticker price is not the real price for either tool. Two gotchas decide whether the cheap-looking plan actually fits you.
Fathom's hidden cost is CRM behind a wall. Fathom's free and Premium tiers are excellent for recording and summaries, but automatic Salesforce and HubSpot logging lives on the higher Team and Business tiers. If CRM sync is the reason you are buying, your real Fathom price is the Team/Business seat, not the Premium one. Budget accordingly.
Fireflies' hidden cost is the credit and minute system. Fireflies meters usage with credits and per-seat monthly transcription allocations. A plan that reads as cheap per seat can run out of minutes mid-month on a heavy meeting load, and overages or upgrades follow. Fathom, by contrast, has no credit system at all, which is one of its quiet advantages for predictable cost. When you compare the entry prices below, weigh them against how many meeting-minutes you actually run.
Free plan: Fathom's biggest edge
This is the row that decides it for the most solo buyers, and it is where Fathom is clearly stronger.
Fathom's free plan records and transcribes unlimited meetings. You keep every recording and transcript. Full AI summaries, action items, and ask-anything are what get capped on free (by 2026 counts, roughly 5 fully summarized meetings per month); you still get the raw recording and transcript for the rest. For a solo user, founder, consultant, or anyone who wants reliable notes without paying, Fathom free is genuinely usable as a daily driver.
Fireflies' free plan is more limited. It includes transcription but caps you on credits and storage, so a normal week of meetings hits the wall faster. Fireflies free is fine for trying the product and light use, but it is built to push you toward a paid seat sooner than Fathom's free is.
If "which is cheaper to actually live on without paying" is your question, Fathom's free tier is the answer most of the time. That single difference is why many independent reviews hand Fathom the win for individuals.
Accuracy: what our own testing showed
Most "vs" pages either skip accuracy or assert one tool "is more accurate" with nothing behind it. So we ran both tools on the same recordings and graded the output ourselves.
Here is what we saw, meeting by meeting:
| Test meeting | Fathom transcript | Fireflies transcript | Summary fidelity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean 2-person, good mics | ~94% usable, very few errors | ~92% usable, very few errors | Both faithful; Fathom action items slightly cleaner |
| 4-person, crosstalk + accent | ~87%, fewer dropped words | ~86%, handled the accent a touch better | Fireflies over-summarized one decision; Fathom stayed literal |
| Noisy 1-on-1, laptop mic | ~82%, similar garbling | ~81%, similar garbling | Both thinned detail; neither invented facts |
What it adds up to: on clean audio the two are effectively tied. Fathom's summaries stuck more closely to what was actually said and were the safer default for important recaps. Fireflies' standout was the richer layer on top of the transcript: speaker talk-time, topic tracking, and coaching signals that Fathom does not match, plus slightly better handling of the accented speaker in our crosstalk test.
- Neither tool hallucinated facts in our runs, but Fireflies was the one that occasionally smoothed two points into a single overstated "decision," so read its recaps against the transcript on important calls.
- Both degraded with crosstalk, strong accents, and bad microphones. No AI notetaker is immune, and no single accuracy number, ours included, will predict what your specific meetings produce.
The practical takeaway still stands: do not buy on any accuracy claim, vendor's or ours. Run each tool on two or three of your own real meetings, including one with multiple speakers and one with imperfect audio, and compare the transcripts and summaries side by side. That is the only benchmark that matters for your purchase.
Our weighted scores
To turn the testing into a single number, we weighted the factors a buyer actually feels: accuracy and summary fidelity 35%, free-plan value 20%, CRM and analytics depth 20%, languages 10%, integrations 10%, and everyday UX 5%.
| Category (weight) | Fathom | Fireflies |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy + summary fidelity (35%) | 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Free-plan value (20%) | 9.3 | 6.8 |
| CRM + analytics depth (20%) | 7.0 | 9.2 |
| Languages (10%) | 8.0 | 9.5 |
| Integrations (10%) | 7.5 | 9.0 |
| Everyday UX (5%) | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Weighted overall | 8.5 | 8.0 |
Fathom comes out ahead overall, carried by its free plan, summary fidelity, and simplicity, but the row scores show exactly where Fireflies wins: CRM, analytics, languages, and integration breadth. If those rows are what you care about, Fireflies is your tool regardless of the headline number.
Pricing: current 2026 tiers
Prices below were verified in June 2026 against each vendor's pricing page and current third-party reviews. Confirm on each vendor's page before buying, since plans and credit allocations shift frequently.
Fathom
- Free: unlimited recording and transcription; full AI summaries and action items on roughly 5 meetings/month.
- Premium: ~$19/user/month month-to-month, or about $15/user/month billed annually; unlocks unlimited AI summaries, ask-anything AI, and more templates.
- Team:
$29/user/month monthly ($19 annually), adding team features, shared recordings, and CRM workflows. - Team Pro / Business:
$39/user/month monthly ($29 annually), adding deeper CRM sync, admin controls, and analytics. - No credit system. Usage is not metered by credits, which keeps costs predictable.
Fireflies
- Free: transcription with limited credits and storage.
- Pro: ~$18/user/month month-to-month, or about $10/user/month billed annually; adds more transcription, AI summaries, and integrations.
- Business: ~$19/user/month (similar annually), adding conversation intelligence, talk-time analytics, and team features.
- Enterprise: ~$39/user/month or custom, adding SSO, advanced security, and admin controls.
- Credit/minute caps apply per seat, so check the monthly transcription allocation against your meeting load.
The headline: Fireflies' annual Pro seat is the cheaper paid entry, and its CRM sync arrives on lower tiers, so for a cost-sensitive sales team it can be the better-value buy. But Fathom's free plan is so much more generous that many individuals never need to pay at all, and its lack of a credit system makes cost predictable. Compare what each gives you for free first, then weigh the paid tiers against how you will actually use them.
Where Fathom wins
Recap: Team aligned on a Thursday asset deadline and a launch date to confirm.
- Sam: deliver launch assets by Thursday
- Alex: confirm and circulate the launch date
Fathom is built around a genuinely free product and simplicity. Its free plan records unlimited meetings, its post-call summaries and action items were the more faithful of the two in our testing, and clip-and-highlight sharing is a core strength for sending a single moment to a colleague. There is no credit system to track, the interface is clean, and for many people it feels more bot-free than Fireflies because it does not always appear as a separate participant. If your loop is record, summarize, and share, and you do not want to pay for the privilege, Fathom is the strongest fit and the higher overall scorer in our scorecard above.
Fathom limitations to weigh: CRM sync to Salesforce and HubSpot is locked behind the higher Team/Business tiers, conversation intelligence and coaching analytics are lighter than Fireflies', language support (around 28 to 38) trails Fireflies' 100-plus, and full unlimited AI summaries on the free plan are capped before you upgrade to Premium. For a fuller breakdown of when to leave Fathom, see our Fathom alternative guide.
Where Fireflies wins
Topics: Pricing, launch timeline, asset handoff
Pushed call notes to the linked Salesforce opportunity.
Fireflies is built around depth for teams that run on data. It layers conversation intelligence on top of the transcript: talk-time ratios, topic tracking, sentiment, and coaching signals that help sales managers review reps. It supports 100-plus languages, far more than Fathom, and it has 40-plus native integrations including Slack, Notion, Asana, Zapier, and the CRMs. Crucially, its Salesforce and HubSpot sync arrives on lower-priced tiers than Fathom's, so a cost-sensitive sales team gets automatic CRM logging without buying the top plan. If you run a revenue team or multilingual calls and want analytics, not just notes, Fireflies has real strengths Fathom does not match.
Fireflies limitations to weigh: it sends a visible AI assistant (Fred) into the call as a participant that may need admitting; its credit and minute caps can bite on heavy meeting loads; its free plan is more limited than Fathom's; and in December 2025 a proposed class action, Cruz v. Fireflies.AI, alleged it recorded conversations without all participants' consent. That is an allegation working through the courts, not a ruling, but it is a reason to read its consent and data terms carefully. For more, see our Fireflies alternative guide and our explainers on conversation intelligence and CRM integration.
The capture method, and a third option
Here is the trade-off neither tool fully escapes: both record your call, and Fireflies does it with a visible assistant on the participant list. Fathom often feels more bot-free because it does not always appear as a separate participant, but it is still capturing the meeting. On an external sales call or a sensitive internal review, a named bot on the roster (Fireflies) is something people notice. If that is fine for your meetings, the cost is small. If a clean participant list is non-negotiable, it becomes the whole decision.
If that is your sticking point, a third category is worth knowing about: botless notetakers that capture what you already see and hear without adding anyone to the call. Scribbl is one example. It runs as a Chrome extension on Google Meet (with Zoom and Microsoft Teams on its Team plan), so there is no extra participant, no admission step, and nothing announced to your guests. It has a free plan with no credit card, and it connects each meeting to ChatGPT or Claude so the follow-up gets written, not just transcribed. Scribbl is rated 5.0 from 3,000 reviews and used across more than 10,000 organizations. It is not a fit for everyone (no built-in conversation-intelligence dashboards like Fireflies, no in-app CRM workflows on the free tier), but if a clean participant list is what you are after, it is the trade Fathom and Fireflies cannot make. We compare it directly in our Scribbl vs Fathom and Scribbl vs Fireflies breakdowns, and the botless AI notetaker explainer covers the category.
- Capture: both record the call; Fireflies joins as a visible assistant (Fred)
- Fathom strength: unlimited free recording, faithful summaries, no credit system
- Fireflies strength: conversation intelligence, cheaper CRM sync, 100-plus languages
- Trade-off: a participant on the roster (Fireflies) and Fireflies' Dec 2025 consent suit
- Capture: botless, nothing ever joins the call
- Strength: free plan, no credit card, follow-up wired into ChatGPT or Claude
- Platforms: Google Meet via extension; Zoom and Teams on the Team plan
- Trust: rated 5.0 from 3,000 reviews across 10,000-plus organizations
Who should pick which
- Pick Fathom if you are a solo user, founder, consultant, or small team that wants the most generous free plan (unlimited recording), the more faithful summaries in our testing, easy clip sharing, no credit system, and a simpler tool. It topped our scorecard at 8.5 and is the right default for individuals and privacy-leaning buyers who do not need deep CRM workflows.
- Pick Fireflies if you run a sales or revenue team that needs conversation intelligence, talk-time and coaching analytics, 100-plus languages, a broad integration ecosystem, and affordable Salesforce or HubSpot sync on a lower tier. It scored 8.0 overall but leads outright on the CRM, analytics, languages, and integration rows. Weigh its credit caps and the December 2025 consent suit.
- Enterprise buyers should compare Fathom Business and Fireflies Enterprise on SSO, admin controls, security review, and data-handling terms directly, since both add governance at the top tier and the right pick depends on your existing CRM and compliance stack.
- Consider a botless tool like Scribbl if your real objection is a bot on the participant list at all. You get notes plus AI follow-up with nothing added to the call, a free plan with no credit card, and each meeting wired into ChatGPT or Claude. You trade away Fireflies' analytics dashboards and in-app CRM workflows to get there. Start free at extension.app.scribbl.co/signup.
FAQ
Is Fathom or Fireflies better?
Fathom is the better default for solo users and small teams because its free plan records unlimited meetings and its post-call summaries are clean and faithful. Fireflies is better for sales and revenue teams because its conversation intelligence, talk-time analytics, 100-plus language support, and cheaper per-seat CRM sync go deeper. Pick Fathom for the most generous free plan and simplicity; pick Fireflies for analytics, coaching, and affordable CRM integration.
Is Fathom really free, and what is the catch?
Yes, Fathom has a genuinely free plan that records and transcribes unlimited meetings with no credit card. The catch is that full AI summaries and ask-anything are capped on free (around 5 fully summarized meetings per month by 2026 counts), and CRM sync to Salesforce or HubSpot is locked behind the paid Team/Business tiers. For pure recording and transcripts, free goes a long way; for unlimited summaries and CRM, you pay.
Does Fireflies use a bot, and is it bot-free like Fathom?
Fireflies sends a visible AI assistant (Fred) that joins the call as a participant and may need to be admitted. Fathom commonly runs as a desktop or browser app that does not always appear as a separate participant, so it can feel more bot-free than Fireflies, though both ultimately record the call. If you want zero bot in the room with nothing on the participant list, a botless tool like Scribbl captures Google Meet through a Chrome extension instead.
Which is more accurate, Fathom or Fireflies?
We ran both on the same three recorded meetings. On clean English audio they were close, both landing in the high-80s to low-90s for usable transcript accuracy. Fathom's summaries stayed closer to what was actually said and rarely invented detail; Fireflies caught more multilingual and accented speech and had richer speaker analytics, but over-summarized one decision in our crosstalk test. Both degraded with crosstalk and bad mics, so test each on your own calls.
Which integrates better with my CRM (Salesforce or HubSpot)?
Both connect to Salesforce and HubSpot, but Fireflies is the cheaper and broader path. Fireflies has 40-plus native integrations and pushes notes and call data into CRM on lower-priced paid tiers, while Fathom gates CRM sync behind its higher Team/Business plans. If automatic CRM logging at the lowest cost is your priority, Fireflies wins this row; if you only need Slack, Notion, and calendar, Fathom is simpler.
Should I worry about the Fireflies lawsuit and recording consent?
In December 2025 a proposed class action (Cruz v. Fireflies.AI) alleged the assistant recorded conversations without all participants' consent. It is an allegation working through the courts, not a ruling, but it is a reason to read consent and data-handling terms closely. More broadly, recording laws vary by region and some require all-party consent, so whatever tool you choose, tell people you are recording and get consent.
Can I take notes without any bot joining the call?
Yes. If a participant on the roster is your real objection, a botless tool like Scribbl captures Google Meet through a Chrome extension with nothing added to the call, on a free plan with no credit card, and connects each meeting to ChatGPT or Claude so the follow-up actually gets written. It adds Zoom and Microsoft Teams through its desktop app. You can start free at extension.app.scribbl.co/signup.
Try Scribbl
Let your meetings take their own notes.
Scribbl records, transcribes, and summarizes your Google Meet calls from your browser. No bot joins the call. Free forever for individuals.
Add to Chrome · It's free